RomanDavis comments on The Irrationality Game - Less Wrong

38 Post author: Will_Newsome 03 October 2010 02:43AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (910)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: RomanDavis 17 December 2010 10:58:45PM 2 points [-]

Downvoted. I've seen the evidence, too.

Comment author: MrShaggy 24 December 2010 03:43:52AM 2 points [-]

Downvoted means you agree (on this thread), correct? If so, I've wanted to see a post on rationality and nutrition for a while (on the benefits of high-animal fat diet for health and the rationality lessons behind why so many demonize that and so few know it).

Comment author: Desrtopa 17 December 2010 11:11:14PM 0 points [-]

What evidence?

If you're referring to the Atkins diet, I think that's a rather different matter from simply eating lots of bacon fat and sour cream, which doesn't preclude also eating plenty of carbohydrates.

Or worse, it might entail eating nothing else. The post isn't very precise.

Comment author: RomanDavis 17 December 2010 11:19:24PM *  1 point [-]

Eating some is better than none, because certain nutrients in animal fat are helpful for CDC. The point that vegetarianism is over rated for the health benefits is contrarian enough here and in the wider world to make a good post.

But yes, losing other vital nutrients would be bad.

And Atkins is silly and unhealthy. Why bring it up?

Comment author: Desrtopa 17 December 2010 11:40:41PM 1 point [-]

Because I thought that might be what you were referring to.

My mother lost about 90 pounds on it, and her health is definitely better than it was when she was overweight, but it did have some rather unpleasant side effects (although she generally refuses to acknowledge them, since they're lost in the halo effect.)