komponisto comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, part 4 - Less Wrong

3 Post author: gjm 07 October 2010 09:12PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (649)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: komponisto 17 October 2010 10:14:55AM *  11 points [-]

Eliezer Yudkowsky...screamed at my former business partner... and then wept "like a little girl"... I thus cannot accept that someone is "rational" because he self-publishes that he is, and worships Bayes' Theorem.

The test of whether one is rational is in fact whether one obeys Bayes' Theorem, not whether one avoids screaming or weeping.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 19 October 2010 03:16:42PM *  13 points [-]

Another good test of rationality is whether you're more confused by fiction than by reality. Just thought I should mention that in this connection.

Comment author: wedrifid 17 October 2010 11:29:21AM *  3 points [-]

The test of whether one is rational is in fact whether one obeys Bayes' Theorem, not whether one avoids screaming or weeping.

(Insert 'epistemically' rational to make the first half true. The part about the screaming is right regardless.)

EDIT: Upvoted the parent to 0 make sure it didn't look like it was me who downvoted it. I know you just hate unexplained downvotes that don't appear to have any cause.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 17 October 2010 11:24:14AM 2 points [-]

The test of whether one is rational is in fact whether one obeys Bayes' Theorem

People don't generally "obey Bayes' theorem", and in the nuts and bolts of human rationality that is hardly the salient feature, merely something to look for when situation allows.