JenniferRM comments on Love and Rationality: Less Wrongers on OKCupid - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (329)
When I worked on a "search and metrics" team, one of the things we discovered by trying a recommendations engine implementation on a slice of the site's traffic for a bit was that what seemed to matter most for the purposes of the recommendation engine was simply that a user had any reaction at all to a video. It seemed that the vast majority of content space just bores any given person, but "passions predict passions" even when the passions have different valence (hate/love).
Maybe my experiences don't apply here, but it doesn't seem entirely unreasonable to imagine that OKCupid's "stupid algorithm" operating on naive behavior could out perform algorithmically aware meta-strategy that "made sense" but hadn't been validated with some sort of field experimentation :-)
I believe you can get yourself off the list as liking something, but only by selecting "not an interest" when presented with an icebreaker match based on that flag.
I, for instance, am officially off the lists as liking "having fun," the phrase being included in my profile as part of a jab at people who say that they "like having fun."
Ha--that's interesting, although not too surprising. A lot of people looking at media seek out things they think are awful on purpose, to get riled up and then pass it on. (There's an Abstruse Goose about that, although I can't for the life of me find it.) I'd like to think it's less true that people actively seek out dating profiles of people they think are horrible, but in my heart I know that it isn't. : \
In general I would agree not to assume that their algorithm is wrong when they're the ones with the data. But I still think it's a better use of my time to find people who like what I like.