NancyLebovitz comments on Love and Rationality: Less Wrongers on OKCupid - Less Wrong

19 Post author: Relsqui 11 October 2010 06:35AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (329)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 17 October 2010 09:12:00AM 1 point [-]

For me, bullies children = utterly revolting.

I'm surprised this isn't widely shared, but I seem to be an odd person in many respects.

Comment author: komponisto 17 October 2010 09:48:52AM *  6 points [-]

Your perspective is that of an adult, of course; but the Harry Potter books are children's literature, and thus (I presume) take a child's point of view on the world. Children often perceive adult authority figures as "mean" even when they are well within the bounds of what (adult) society considers to be acceptable behavior. Such "meanness", while unpleasant, is not something children are necessarily shocked by; they expect it in more or less the same way that adults expect "outrageous" actions from the government .

Comment author: wedrifid 17 October 2010 11:51:40AM 2 points [-]

Snape doesn't even beat the children does he? That puts him ahead of what has often been considered acceptable behaviour to direct towards children.

Comment author: gwern 18 October 2010 04:59:41PM *  1 point [-]

He mentally beats them - between the implied Legilimency and verbal humiliation, I think a lot of his students would have preferred the occasional physical slap or kick.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 17 October 2010 10:38:29AM 1 point [-]

Is your point that Harry isn't shocked by Snape's behavior, so that a good many readers aren't, either? I don't remember if Harry had a general opinion about Snape's viciousness.

The women who find Snape attractive aren't children themselves-- I don't know what the typical lower age limit for liking Snape is.

IIRC, Rowling hated the way Snape taught. She could have presented his nastiness as part of a useful toughening process, but she didn't.

Of course, as the books went on, not only did he eventually redeem himself, but (earlier) Umbridge made him look like a relatively less awful teacher.

Comment author: CronoDAS 17 October 2010 07:28:46PM 2 points [-]

I agree; Snape ought to have been revolting. I don't know why he wasn't.