cousin_it comments on The Dark Arts - Preamble - Less Wrong

44 Post author: Aurini 11 October 2010 02:01PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (139)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: cousin_it 12 October 2010 11:44:43AM *  2 points [-]

Your definition is too broad - for example, it applies to women using makeup. Maybe amend it to "creating negative emotions in someone else for the purpose of getting them to do something".

Comment author: khafra 12 October 2010 03:50:59PM 2 points [-]

Specifying negative emotions is too narrow; that wouldn't apply to any strategy that leaves its target marginally happier but at a resource cost considerably greater than the marginal increase in happiness could've been obtained with elsewhere. Of Cialdini's 6 "weapons of influence," all of which I'd classify as manipulative, only "authority" seems to cause negative emotions with any consistency. PErhaps the metric is orthogonal to the quality of emotion?

Comment author: Relsqui 12 October 2010 05:35:57PM 1 point [-]

"Negative emotions" certainly isn't right--the example in the post was about making the woman feel better.

I'm not sure I agree with your exception (I don't equate "making a good impression" or "living up to a social expectation" with "creating emotion"), but perhaps we could make it clearer by adding "for a specific decision" to the end? i.e. the manipulation must have a specific goal.

Comment author: cousin_it 13 October 2010 12:52:27PM *  1 point [-]

The example in the post is not okay because it's piggybacking on an existing negative emotion, and if the woman refused, that emotion would've been reinforced. Like a guilt trip.

Comment author: Relsqui 13 October 2010 07:14:15PM 2 points [-]

So do you not think it's possible to manipulate through positive emotion? What about flattering and pampering someone 'til they fall for you, then robbing them blind?

Comment author: cousin_it 13 October 2010 11:48:23PM 0 points [-]

It's possible, but I don't have the same aversion to it.

Comment author: Relsqui 14 October 2010 01:32:09AM 1 point [-]

Wait, what? Really? You don't find that example scenario objectionable?

Comment author: cousin_it 14 October 2010 01:37:18AM 0 points [-]

Hmm. To me it's kinda "bad in theory", like killing kittens. The strong hate is reserved for the things I actually did a lot and then decided to cut out.

Comment author: Relsqui 14 October 2010 01:41:49AM 1 point [-]

Heh. Okay, we think about those things very differently, but that's fine. :P