= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Stuart_Armstrong comments on If you don't know the name of the game, just tell me what I mean to you - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (26)
Sorry, that last part of the response was unworthy; but if you're being condescending to me, I feel the immense urge to be condescending back.
The last part of your response was unworthy? Don't apologize, I had it coming.
The last part of my ("not rocket science") response was unworthy? Well, I'll apologize, if you insist, but I really think that you did a good job with the first (tutorial) post, but a rather confused and confusing job with the second post, when you thought you were sharing original research.
Well, the posts were actually written for the purpose of the second post, and the new results therein. The first one was tacked on as an afterthought, when I realised it would be nice to explain the background to people.
Once again, my ability to predict which post people on less wrong will like fails spectacularly.