Sewing-Machine comments on The Problem With Trolley Problems - Less Wrong

11 Post author: lionhearted 23 October 2010 05:14AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (112)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Perplexed 23 October 2010 07:48:59PM 5 points [-]

But physicists don't ignore friction when performing experiments, they do so only in teaching. If philosophers used trolley problems only to teach ethics ("Push one fat philosopher onto the tracks, to save two drug addicts.") or to teach metaethics ("An adherent of virtue ethics probably wouldn't push") then I doubt that lionhearted would complain.

But we have psychologists using trolley problems to perform experiments (or, if from Harvard, to publish papers in which they claim to have conducted experiments). That is what I understand lionhearted to be objecting to.

Comment author: [deleted] 25 October 2010 07:43:47PM 2 points [-]

Physicists ignore friction when teaching, when thinking, and when performing experiments. Doing so reduces confusion, and allows for greater understanding of the effects of friction once attention is turned to it.

The fact that the analogous situation in moral philosophy increases confusion is revealing.

Comment author: Perplexed 25 October 2010 07:46:41PM 2 points [-]

Yes. It reveals that physicists understand their subject well enough to know what can profitably be ignored ... but moral philosophers do not.

Comment author: [deleted] 25 October 2010 07:48:20PM 0 points [-]

I don't disagree.