SarahC comments on Optimism versus cryonics - Less Wrong

34 Post author: lsparrish 25 October 2010 02:13AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (104)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 25 October 2010 11:49:12AM 1 point [-]

It actually didn't occur to me to wear a helmet in a car.

For me this was sort of the dividing line between "I'm young, I'll live forever" and "Wait, shit, I won't, I really do need to do all those boring things like use hand sanitizer and look both ways before crossing the street and take my vitamins."

Comment author: Jonathan_Graehl 25 October 2010 08:00:33PM 4 points [-]

Wait, should I wear a helmet in my car? :) It sounds plausible. I'd say no, because of reduced visibility increasing odds of accident, and already ample protection from airbags, seatbelt, and crumple-zone into rigid structure protecting against crushing.

Comment author: khafra 27 October 2010 09:02:24PM 2 points [-]

A good motorcycle helmet provides well over 180 degrees of side vision, while your peripheral vision can only reach about 160 degrees. While I can't find a reference, IIRC the percentage of motorcycling fatalities resulting from head injuries is around 50%, and the percentage of car fatalities resulting from head injuries is considerably higher. So, disregarding the vastly diminished prior probability of all-cause fatalities in a car, you should actually be more adamantly in favor of helmet use in a car than on a motorcycle.

Comment author: JGWeissman 27 October 2010 09:15:34PM 2 points [-]

So, disregarding the vastly diminished prior probability of all-cause fatalities in a car,

Why would we disregard that?