CarlShulman comments on Making your explicit reasoning trustworthy - Less Wrong

82 Post author: AnnaSalamon 29 October 2010 12:00AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (93)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 01 November 2010 05:17:17AM 6 points [-]

I hope you'll also post about how you reasoned yourself out of it.

Comment author: David_Gerard 01 November 2010 11:49:11AM *  5 points [-]

Reading the sucker shoot analogy in a Florence Littauer book (CAUTION: Littauer is memetic toxic waste with some potentially useful bits). That was the last straw after months of doubts, the bit where it went "click! Oh, this is actually really bad for me, isn't it?" Had my social life been on the internet then (this was 1993) this would have been followed with a "gosh, that was stupid, wasn't it?" post. I hope.

It may be relevant that I was reading the Littauer book because Littauer's books and personality theories were officially advocated in the MLM in question (Omegatrend, a schism of Amway) - so it seemed to be coming from inside. I worry slightly that I might have paid insufficient attention had it been from outside.

I'd be interested to know how others (a) suffered a memetic cold (b) got out of it. Possible post material.

Comment author: CarlShulman 26 April 2011 05:19:03AM 4 points [-]

Just re-read this thread, and I'm still keen to hear how you reasoned yourself into it.