byrnema comments on Making your explicit reasoning trustworthy - Less Wrong

82 Post author: AnnaSalamon 29 October 2010 12:00AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (93)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: byrnema 09 May 2011 07:28:41PM 0 points [-]

I have a question regarding the Milgram experiment. Were the teachers under the impression that the learners were continuing to supply answers voluntarily?

Comment author: Alicorn 09 May 2011 11:20:56PM 2 points [-]

The learner was perceived to initially agree to the experiment, but among the recordings in the programmed resistance was one demanding to be let out.

Comment author: byrnema 10 May 2011 02:13:23AM 2 points [-]

Ah, also this sentence helped my understanding:

Teachers were instructed to treat silence as an incorrect answer and apply the next shock level to the student.

I imagine -- perhaps erroneously -- that I would have tried to obtain the verbal agreement of the learner before continuing. But, for example, this is because I know that continuous subject consent is required whereas this might not have been generally known or true in the early 60s.

Of course, I do see the pattern that this is probably such a case where everyone wants to rate themselves as above average (but they couldn't possibly all be). Still, I will humor my hero-bone by checking out the book and reading about the heroic exceptions, since those must be interesting.