pnrjulius comments on Making your explicit reasoning trustworthy - Less Wrong

82 Post author: AnnaSalamon 29 October 2010 12:00AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (93)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: TraderJoe 06 March 2012 03:21:14PM 1 point [-]

For example, a Christian might give away all their possessions, rejoice at the death of their children in circumstances where they seem likely to have gone to heaven, and generally treat their chances of Heaven vs Hell as their top priority.

Steven Landsburg used this reasoning, combined with the fact that Christians don't generally do this, to conclude not that Christians don't act on their beliefs, but that Christians don't generally believe what they claim to believe. I think the different conclusion is reached because he assigns a lot more rationality to people than you do. But certainly there are, for some people, very strong incentives against admitting that you've stopped believing in God.

Comment author: pnrjulius 05 April 2012 11:41:47PM 0 points [-]

What does it mean, actually, to "believe" something? If it implies that you integrate it into your worldview and act accordingly, then these people clearly don't "believe" in that sense. But this may be an altogether too strong notion of what it is to "believe" something, since most people have things they'd say they "believe" that aren't applied in this way.