Vladimir_Nesov comments on Value Deathism - Less Wrong

26 Post author: Vladimir_Nesov 30 October 2010 06:20PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (118)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 30 October 2010 07:33:11PM 3 points [-]

That really depends of what you mean by "our values"

Your values is at least something that on reflection you'd be glad happened, which doesn't apply to acting on human explicit beliefs that are often imprecise or wrong. More generally, any heuristic for good decisions you know doesn't qualify. "Don't kill people" doesn't qualify. Values are a single criterion that doesn't tolerate exceptions and status quo assumptions. See magical categories for further discussion.

Comment author: Emile 30 October 2010 07:43:35PM *  3 points [-]

But that may not be what Ben implied when saying

I think it is ok (if not ideal) if our descendants' values deviate from ours, as ours have from our ancestors.

(I read it as "our ancestors" meaning "the ancient Greeks", not, "early primates" but I may be wrong)

Comment author: wedrifid 30 October 2010 07:49:04PM *  1 point [-]

I read it as "our ancestors" meaning "the ancient Greeks", not, "early primates" but I may be wrong

In a certain sense "primordial single celled replicator" may be an even more relevant comparison than either. Left free to deviate Nash would weed out those pesky 'general primate values'.