Relsqui comments on META: Tiered Discussions - Less Wrong

-7 Post author: Pavitra 30 October 2010 10:37PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (20)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Relsqui 02 November 2010 07:13:46AM 2 points [-]

I had offered these links in the anticipation that they would be taken as sufficient evidence that newbies are in fact obliged to read the entire sequences before commenting

I think you're using "obliged" to mean encouraged/pushed, and Alicorn is using it to mean required-before-being useful. The former is accurate, but to a variable degree; the latter, as she demonstrated, is not.

I had imagined that newbies are turned off by an apparent social pressure to have read the sequences

Yes. and being restricted to a newbie-only (i.e. devoid of useful content!) area until we could prove we had done so would not be less of a turnoff. :P

Comment author: Pavitra 03 November 2010 12:55:53AM 1 point [-]

I've since come to think of the tiered discussions as being in addition to what currently exists, rather than instead of it.

But, uh,

... you used a ciphered message to propose that the site should be more accessible?

yeah, that's a good point.