taw comments on Qualia Soup, a rationalist and a skilled You Tube jockey - Less Wrong

6 Post author: Raw_Power 31 October 2010 02:18PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (53)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Jack 31 October 2010 10:22:21PM 7 points [-]

Einstein wouldn't be considered a scientist by modern criteria?

As far as I can tell the main reason people are blinded to all problems of practice of "science" is the very word "science" itself.

Science by any other name...I think the reason science criticism is difficult and rare is that while the scientific establishment is a mess and desperately needs reform it is constantly under siege by parts of the religious establishment. Good people look at this battle, come to the defense of the lesser evil and ignore the bad in science. It starts as Contrast effect and then turns into Group-serving bias.

Obviously science's enemies aren't equipped to give an accurate critique and her allies are unwilling to undermine their status by offering reasonable criticisms. It actually is a difficult double-bind but more voices that give reasoned and intelligent criticism of science would be good thing.

Comment author: taw 01 November 2010 01:24:16AM 5 points [-]

Einstein wouldn't be considered a scientist by modern criteria?

Definitely. He was firm opponent of the very concept of peer review for example and I fully agree with him on this.

Comment author: Alexandros 13 December 2010 05:12:41PM 2 points [-]

The requirement to sign allegiance to Peer Review with blood before being given the PhD has recently been withdrawn.