= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Luke_Grecki comments on What I would like the SIAI to publish - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (218)
AFAICT the main value in addressing such concerns in detail consists would lie in convincing AGI researchers to change their course of action. Do you think this would actually occur?
To answer this question it seems like it would be useful to understand the motives behind those researching AGI. I don't know much about this. Maybe those who have interacted with these researchers (or the researchers themselves) can shed some light?
It depends on how convincing the argument is.
I think 1 in 5 would change if they heard a obviously correct argument.