A "nemesis" environment that feeds misleading evidence to a decision theory's underlying epistimology does not indicate the sort of problem illustrated by an environment in which a decision theory does something stupid with true information.
What you asked for was a case where a decision theory did worse than its rivals.
However, that seems pretty trivial if it behaves differently from them - you just consider an appropriate pathological environment set up to punish that decision theory.
A monthly thread for posting rationality-related quotes you've seen recently (or had stored in your quotesfile for ages).