wedrifid comments on The Curve of Capability - Less Wrong

18 Post author: rwallace 04 November 2010 08:22PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (264)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: wedrifid 05 November 2010 12:15:09AM *  0 points [-]

Are you serious? You presented your own hypothesis for the outcome of the experiment before I gave mine! They are both obviously falsifiable.

I think, in no uncertain terms, that this rhetorical question was an extremely poor one.

Comment author: rwallace 05 November 2010 12:34:15AM -1 points [-]

Clearly we aren't going to agree on whether my question was a good one or a poor one, so agreeing to differ on that, what exactly would falsify your theory?

Comment author: wedrifid 05 November 2010 12:52:17AM *  0 points [-]

The grandparent answered that question quite clearly.

You make a prediction here of what would happen if this happened. I reply that that would actually happen instead. You falsify each of these theories by making this happen and observing the results.

I note that you are trying to play the 'unfalsifiable card' in two different places here and I am treating them differently because you question different predictions. I note this to avoid confusion if you meant them to be a single challenge to the overall position. So see other branch if you mean only to say "FOOM is unfalsifiable".

Comment author: rwallace 05 November 2010 03:50:11AM 0 points [-]

Ah, then I'm asking whether "in situation X, the world will end" is your theory's only prediction - since that's the same question I've ended up asking in the other branch, let's pursue it in the other branch.