= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Vladimir_Nesov comments on The Curve of Capability - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (264)
Also lipstick. Don't forget lipstick.
(Your comment isn't very clear, so I'm not sure what you intended to say by the statement I cited.)
Thanks for posting the link.
My point was that some of the most interesting things people do aren't obviously algorithmic.
It's impressive that programs beat chess grandmasters. It would be more impressive (and more evidential that self-optimization is possible) if a computer could invent a popular game.
What is this statement intended as an argument for?
(What do you mean by "algorithmic"? It's a human category, just like "interesting". )