wedrifid comments on The hard limits of hard nanotech - Less Wrong

19 Post author: lsparrish 07 November 2010 12:49AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (53)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: wedrifid 01 December 2010 05:13:42AM *  0 points [-]

Clippy would tile the universe with computronium doing something like recursively simulating universes tiled with paperclips.

That is an interesting claim. I would be surprised to find that Clippy was content with simulated clips. Humans seem more likely to be satisfied with simulation than paperclippers. We identify ourselves by our thoughts.

Comment author: Kevin 01 December 2010 05:22:21AM 0 points [-]

Well, no, he's not just happy with simulated paperclips. The computronium he would tile is paperclip shaped, and presumably better to have that paperclipcomputronium simulating paperclips than anything else?

Comment author: shokwave 01 December 2010 02:21:26PM 0 points [-]

presumably better to have that paperclipcomputronium simulating paperclips than anything else?

Given that Clippy makes computronium at all, sure, but computronium is probably less efficient than some other non-work-performing material at forming paperclips.

Comment author: wedrifid 01 December 2010 01:38:17PM 0 points [-]

Well, you know him better than I! You have a business relationship and all.