= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
DanielVarga comments on The Strong Occam's Razor - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (71)
This is a cool theory, but it is probably equivalent to another, less cool theory that yields identical predictions and does not reference infinite virtual universes. :)
Although it postulates the existence of infinitely many inaccessible universes, it may be simpler than equivalent theories which imply only a single universe.
I feel like this is an argument we've seen before, but with more hilarious self-referentiality.
Perhaps in The Finale of the Ultimate Meta Mega Crossover?
If I am not mistaken, it is a bit more formalized version of Greg Egan's Dust Theory.
I was actually referring to the (slightly superficial) similarity to the MWI vs. collapse discussion that indirectly prompted this post.