pjeby comments on Diplomacy as a Game Theory Laboratory - Less Wrong

44 Post author: Yvain 12 November 2010 10:19PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (93)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: pjeby 13 November 2010 05:27:06PM 5 points [-]

Religion is a special case of the enforceable side-contract in which God is doing the enforcing. God doesn't have to exist for this to work; as long as at least one party believes He does, the threat of punishment will be credible. The advantage of being able to easily make enforceable side contracts even in the absence of social authority may be one reason religion became so popular, and if humans do turn out to have a genetic tendency toward belief, the side contracts might have provided part of the survival advantage that spread the gene.

By the way, the book, "The Evolution of God" makes a very strong case for religious beliefs as the original enabler of non-zero-sum games between non-kin, by showing the parallels in the development of religion and government as humans progress from tribes to chiefdoms to kingdoms and empires, and the ways in which religions were modified "just-in-time" to serve both intra-group co-operation and intergroup alliances. Fascinating stuff.