NancyLebovitz comments on Do you visualize Omega? - Less Wrong

4 Post author: NancyLebovitz 15 November 2010 10:03AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (29)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 15 November 2010 10:39:43AM 1 point [-]

If something came to me claiming to be Omega, I wouldn't have a good way of judging whether to believe it.

If I saw a reason to think about Omega problems, I would push back against the way I visualize the situation.

As it is, I've just got more sympathy with a friend who had problems with math because she'd overthink word problems.

Comment author: ThomasR 15 November 2010 02:24:19PM 1 point [-]

What do yuo mean with "Omega"? E.g. Chaitin's Omega or large cardinals do not fit the remarks.

Comment author: [deleted] 15 November 2010 05:00:06PM 2 points [-]

http://wiki.lesswrong.com/wiki/Omega

A being with the ability to predict the future with 100% (or near) accuracy and with arbitrarily-large power. LessWrongian for 'God', to a first approximation.

Comment author: [deleted] 16 November 2010 02:29:50AM 1 point [-]

He also is not malicious and/or doesn't lie, which combined with his infallibility means you can trust whatever he tells you.