dreeves comments on Reference Points - Less Wrong

32 Post author: lionhearted 17 November 2010 08:09AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (45)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: dreeves 17 November 2010 03:54:43PM 2 points [-]

I'm not convinced that this amounts to practical advice. As you eloquently argue, the whole problem of akrasia is being unduly influenced by immediate consequences. The way I would put it is that immediate consequences act like a drug that distorts your decision-making. So "change your reference point" sounds like "don't be influenced by this drug". Easier said than done!

There's a parallel debate about this going on here: http://lesswrong.com/lw/33s/antiakrasia_reprise/

PS: Here's a link to a pdf of the chapter “The Intimate Contest for Self-command” from Schelling's book: http://www.nationalaffairs.com/public_interest/detail/the-intimate-contest-for-self-command I believe that chapter subsumes his seminal 1978 AER article on Egonomics: http://www.jstor.org/pss/1816707

Comment author: DSimon 22 November 2010 07:39:29PM 0 points [-]

So "change your reference point" sounds like "don't be influenced by this drug".

To me it sounds like "Switch to a different drug that's better for you".