Vaniver comments on Imperfect Levers - Less Wrong

6 Post author: blogospheroid 17 November 2010 07:12PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (36)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Vaniver 18 November 2010 05:16:40AM 0 points [-]

Concentrating your best people does help, but you can't get the equivalent of the best people by just clustering together enough people.

Not sure about this either. It seems like a few good people can be as effective as a great person, and a few great people as effective as a fantastic person, especially when you're looking for things that are broader (design an airplane) rather than deeper (design general relativity). It's very possible we've hit saturation and so this isn't as noticeable; the few great people aren't competing against one fantastic person, but a few fantastic people.

Comment author: atucker 18 November 2010 11:44:05AM 0 points [-]

I worded that too strongly. You get diminishing returns on possible breakthroughs after a certain point. You get more effective smartness, but its not drastically better to the extent that a GAI is.