lsparrish comments on Suspended Animation Inc. accused of incompetence - Less Wrong

38 Post author: CronoDAS 18 November 2010 12:20AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (127)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: lsparrish 05 December 2010 06:45:13PM *  0 points [-]

You seem to be claiming that your disinterest in the service is solely motivated by it is not being good enough to justify the investment. But you also say you were offered the possibility of getting the service for free, with a promotion thrown in.

I'm having a hard time being convinced that your rejection of cryonics is motivated solely by a financial cost-benefit analysis.

Comment author: melmax 05 December 2010 07:13:04PM 4 points [-]

Luke misses the obvious point, as usual. I am not inclined to endorse, (or allow someone to endorse, on my behalf), the activities of those I consider to be quite incompetent, unprofessional and unethical. These organizations have consistently failed to provide the services they sell, with any degree of skill and finesse. They've made a mockery of all that is dear to me, in regard to hypothermic medicine. In my opinion, to provide any sort of funding to them, (whether directly, or indirectly), would constitute participating in fraudulent activities, perpetuating extremely substandard services, and delaying any possible real progress, in the field of cryonics.

Comment author: jsalvatier 06 December 2010 05:00:15PM 2 points [-]

I want to Welcome you to LessWrong, and say that I hope you will stick around beyond this argument.

Comment author: lsparrish 05 December 2010 07:15:45PM *  -2 points [-]

In my opinion, to provide any sort of funding to them, (whether directly, or indirectly), would constitute participating in fraudulent activities, perpetuating extremely substandard services, and delaying any possible real progress, in the field of cryonics.

What would be useful to know is whether that was your opinion at the time you made the decision not to accept the services. Also it would be useful to know if you plan to accept the services of an organization that does meet your standards, once it has come into existence (by whatever route -- be it regulation, reform, or replacement). If you are simply not planning to sign up at all, that's fine of course -- but it should not be surprising if this does not exactly inspire trust among cryonicists.