justmyanonymousacct comments on Rationality and being child-free - Less Wrong

11 Post author: InquilineKea 20 November 2010 02:12AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (61)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: justmyanonymousacct 25 November 2010 05:31:13AM 1 point [-]

In the US I've found most clinics are actually fairly picky about the traits they will accept in egg "donors"--who are usually reasonably well-compensated, which is, I suppose, why they can be so selective.

(I think it might be nice to pass on my genetic material. But no one paying through the nose--or any other orifice--for genetic material wants mine. Can't say I blame them.)

Comment author: David_Gerard 25 November 2010 09:44:05AM *  0 points [-]

In the UK, as I said, they're desperate. IVF is a usably reliable technology, but the fact that it's the business of selling hope means that financial parasites have flocked to it, and that's led to heavy regulation ... heavy enough to put donors off. And payment is legally restricted to actual expenses, to a not very big upper limit. So the requirement is pretty much "don't have HIV or known genetic disorders."

So what I said above applies if you're in the UK. Get donating!