This is really the sort of question that would be better served in some game forum. Your previous questions had rationality elements related to them. This does not. I suspect that the large amount of downvoting is due to not just that. If someone posed a difficult math or physics question it might not get the same result. But the combined facts that this is not intrinsically about rationality and doesn't appear as a very intellectual question probably resulted in a lot of downvoting.
The reason I posted it here is because I realised I was clearly biased, and I have more of a social presence here (thus meaning I don't have to learn the social rituals before responding).
I don't want to become known on this website as the guy who is always asking for help with his personal problems (way too much status loss), but I'm still a novice at best as a rationalist and given others don't have my biases asking for advice is the best chance I've got at an objective solution.
I've recently bought a game (with a few days left in which I can return it for a refund) called Dragon Ball Z: Burst Limit. Most of my play experience suggests Rubberband AI, but there aren't any references to it having such on the Internet and programmers have been known to conceal it. I really don't want the game to have it (as it provides a highly inconsistent challenge, and reduces the game to focusing on manipulating the A.I rather than winning), hence my bias, but my own play seems to suggest it does.