Less Wrong is a community blog devoted to refining the art of human rationality. Please visit our About page for more information.

James_Miller comments on What would an ultra-intelligent machine make of the great filter? - Less Wrong

-4 Post author: James_Miller 28 November 2010 06:47PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (10)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: James_Miller 28 November 2010 07:32:17PM -2 points [-]

OK. I think that if an ultra-intelligent AI determines that (a), (b) and (c) are correct then the zoo hypothesis is probably the solution to Fermi's paradox. I think this last sentence "serves a purpose" because (a), (b) and (c) seem somewhat reasonable and thus after reading my post a reader would give a higher weight to the zoo hypothesis being true.

Comment author: [deleted] 29 November 2010 11:34:30AM -1 points [-]

So you are using the ultra-intelligent AI as a kind of Omega, then? To establish that (a), (b), and (c) are definitely true?