= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
kybernetikos comments on Belief in Belief vs. Internalization - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (56)
No, because it assumes you're indifferent to any effects you have on worlds that you don't personally get to experience.
I suppose the goal you were going to spend the money on would have to be of sufficient utility if achieved to offset that in order to make the scenario work. Maybe saving the world, or creating lots of happy simulations of yourself, or finding a way to communicate between them.
In that case what does 'Quantum' and/or many worlds have to do with this?
In that case it sounds like an obviously legit test. Someone disagree?