Eugine_Nier comments on Belief in Belief vs. Internalization - Less Wrong

33 Post author: Desrtopa 29 November 2010 03:12AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (56)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: JamesAndrix 30 November 2010 08:46:37PM 1 point [-]

The two concepts could serve as a rhetorical crowbar:

Is this the kind of invisible dragon that isn't really there but you're in denial? ...or the kind that IS really there but you're in denial?

This in turn makes me think that there are some kinds of evidence that affect our behavior, and other kinds that affects our beliefs, and only partial overlap. (E.G. you know the dragon is there but you're not evolved to be as afraid as you should be, because you can't see, hear, or smell it.)

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 01 December 2010 05:12:15AM 2 points [-]

This in turn makes me think that there are some kinds of evidence that affect our behavior, and other kinds that affects our beliefs, and only partial overlap. (E.G. you know the dragon is there but you're not evolved to be as afraid as you should be, because you can't see, hear, or smell it.)

The standard LW terminology for this is near and far modes of thought.