= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
David_Gerard comments on Cheat codes - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (92)
I agree. What I intended was a markup language that editors could use. Then somebody could surf Wikipedia with some plugin installed so that marked facts would be highlighted in some way. Clicking on the fact would then bring up a box showing the relevant note card (or multiple variants), and you could select to add it to your database.
Links? I'm more keen on the collaborative idea personally, but I haven't totally ruled out a commercial (curated) angle. I'm pretty stingy myself, but I would definitely pay for a high quality SR deck. Maybe I'm unusual though.
There are various plans to finally implement some sort of Wikidata - think "infoboxes on steroids" as an absolute minimum, and then unknown possibilities we haven't even thought of yet. Erik Moller's been asking around the Wikimedia Commons and technical lists for ideas of what we actually want in terms of a specification.
That sounds like a great step in the right direction! I'd love to hear more about this as it evolves.