gjm comments on Rationality Quotes: December 2010 - Less Wrong

6 Post author: Tiiba 03 December 2010 03:23AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (331)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: gjm 03 December 2010 02:22:05PM 13 points [-]

I think this quotation actually comes not from a real papal representative but from Brecht's play "Galileo".

(Isn't it obvious that this isn't the sort of thing a real person would be likely to say? Especially not the sort of person who would be sent to Galileo by the Pope.)

Comment author: RobinZ 03 December 2010 02:36:07PM 10 points [-]

(Isn't it obvious that this isn't the sort of thing a real person would be likely to say? Especially not the sort of person who would be sent to Galileo by the Pope.)

Shhh! That quote is a soldier for Our Side, don't break it! ;)

Comment author: MartinB 04 December 2010 03:12:51AM 1 point [-]

Now should I upvote for the great use of irony, or down for abuses of logic? My joke detector is broken.

Comment author: Alicorn 04 December 2010 03:20:10AM *  13 points [-]

The smiley is there as the equivalent of Braille for the joke-blind.

Comment author: wedrifid 03 December 2010 02:58:25PM *  5 points [-]

Isn't it obvious that this isn't the sort of thing a real person would be likely to say?

No. I've heard similar. (Although it actually felt uncomfortable to give that answer given that it could be seen as not-not supporting a co-aligned solider that we had decided to burn!)

Comment author: MartinB 04 December 2010 03:11:49AM 0 points [-]

decided to burn

There is some doubt over the treatment Galileo actually got, and what for.

Comment author: Normal_Anomaly 05 December 2010 03:09:35AM *  1 point [-]

I think wedrifid meant that e would being seen as supporting a false but favorable quote that everyone else was decrying for being false. [Edited for spelling]

Comment author: wedrifid 05 December 2010 04:31:38AM 0 points [-]

Yes, complete with television show spy talk lingo to extend the analogy.