jaimeastorga2000 comments on Sequences in Alternative Formats - Less Wrong

16 Post author: OneWhoFrogs 04 December 2010 01:40AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (11)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 04 December 2010 09:01:51PM *  0 points [-]

It is true that there are sometimes interesting bits of information and discussion in the article comments, but the good stuff to reading time and effort ratio is much lower (specially because you can't just the "Sort By: Top" function to get the most upvoted replies). Considering the high time investment nature that is already inherent in the sequences, I think the commentless versions are optimal for most readers.

Maybe an editor collecting the sequences could select and include particularly enlightening comments, though.

Comment author: wedrifid 05 December 2010 12:23:55AM 0 points [-]

specially because you can't just the "Sort By: Top" function to get the most upvoted replies

Does not work for the sequences. They were mostly pre comment voting so karma is non representative.