Practical Retroactive Cognition: An Autobiography in Five Short Chapters
Chapter 1
I walk down the street. There is a deep hole in the sidewalk. I fall in. I am lost ... I am helpless. It isn't my fault. It takes forever to find a way out.
Chapter 2
I walk down the same street. There is a deep hole in the sidewalk. I pretend I don't see it. I fall in again. I can't believe I am in the same place. But it isn't my fault. It still takes a long time to get out.
Chapter 3
I walk down the same street. There is a deep hole in the sidewalk. I see it is there. I still fall in ... it's a habit. My eyes are open. I know where I am. It is my fault. I get out immediately.
Chapter 4
I walk down the same street. There is a deep hole in the sidewalk. I walk around it.
Chapter 5
I walk down another street.
Thanks for posting this-- you can't know things until you know them. Also: "Good judgment is learned by experience. Experience is gotten by having bad judgment.", but it's good to see the process of working your way around to being kind to your past self by way of science.
I'd seen the poem about the hole quoted anonymously, but when I looked it up to post it, the first links were embarrassingly religious or stupid. The link I ended up with is a collection of poems by Portia Nelson-- most of them are about the amusing tangles people get themselves into, with relatively little about getting out of them.
I love this poem deeply. I have taken to using "I'm in Chapter N" among people who know it as a shorthand for where I am in that process. (I taught it to a therapist once, in the same spirit.)
sort of repeating myself but typing is less effort than finding/linking right now.
I think that as we/something we make moves up the intelligence scale we will be shocked to discover just how much of what we think of as cognition is actually just pattern matching. I expect this to scale upwards, perhaps up to the limit of intelligence (optimization). that is, n level intelligence looks like crude pattern matching to an n+1 intelligence.
as for your final paragraph: humans are clever/silly enough to not just want to be naive hill climbing algorithms. we don't just want the best outcome given our initial circumstances (position) and logical moves we could have made based on the data available at the time (that way is up), we want to wind up on the objectively highest peak even if it would have meant "stupid" moves in the interim. This is where the "rationality can be harmful" arguments go.
So I guess the lesson here is that you shouldn't blame yourself too much if you've done something that feels obviously wrong in retrospect. That decision was made by an earlier version of you. Although it feels obvious now, that version of you might literally have had no way of knowing that it was making a mistake, as it hadn't been properly trained yet.
I suppose this does not seem to apply when you do stupid things when you are under negative influences. Fatigue for example. I make faux pas all the time when I haven't slept for more than 30 hours.
Cross-posted from my LiveJournal: