Did Hanson's posts specifically feel that way? OB used to be a group blog.

For some posts, only occasionally, I wonder if Robin Hanson is intentionally messing with the LessWrong crowd that's still over there, posting the most plausible stuff he can think of that's.... well... wrong.

But this is simply wild mass guessing on my part.

There's a word for doing that on the Internet. I wonder what that word is.

Yes, that post neglects to mention an obvious fact that makes it come off as hysterical and creepy/potentially dangerous. However, the lesser point that sex-'starved' people (especially men) are unfortunately Acceptable Targets, even though sexual deprivation can be a significant emotional harm, seems true and important.

(It seems to me that people vary a lot in how much they suffer when sexually deprived, and the typical mind fallacy is rampant in both directions, though probably more problematic coming from the low sufferers. As a low sufferer myself, this is not a personal complaint.)

If it were sincere, it would be a sterling example of the dangers of proceeding with no feedback.

It might be trolling, but Hansen has a history of trying to figure out scenarios where whether women actually want sex is irrelevant.