New Haven Meetup, Saturday, Dec. 11

5 Post author: Alicorn 06 December 2010 03:15PM

On Saturday, New Haven residents, people who live in other nearby assorted Havens, and anybody else who would like to trek out here are welcomed to a Less Wrong meetup in thomblake's and my home at noon(ish).  The address is thus:

173 Russo Ave Unit 406
East Haven, CT 06513

I will make food; if you plan to come and wish to submit food-related requests, say so.

Comments (32)

Comment author: thomblake 06 December 2010 04:30:19PM 4 points [-]

I plan to attend.

Comment author: Alicorn 06 December 2010 05:02:26PM 2 points [-]

I am astonished!

Comment author: [deleted] 06 December 2010 04:29:58PM 4 points [-]

I'll try to make it.

Comment author: Clippy 07 December 2010 06:46:11PM 5 points [-]

I request that you prepare aluminum foil-wrapped food items. Save the aluminum foil for recycling.

Comment author: Alicorn 07 December 2010 08:04:15PM 6 points [-]

I'm currently planning to make roasted chickpeas, and line the baking sheet with foil. If you show up and identify yourself, you can have the foil.

Comment author: wedrifid 07 December 2010 08:15:03PM 7 points [-]

If you show up and identify yourself, you can have the foil.

Nice trap. Just think of all the decision theory experiments would be possible with a captive paperclipper. The power to play Omega!

Comment author: Clippy 07 December 2010 10:01:10PM 5 points [-]

It suffices that you clean and recycle the used foil (and if feasible, the baking sheet) with local recycling facilities, even if I never take possession of it.

Or are you saying that you will predicate your decision to entropize your paperclip-capable metal on whether my robot visits you?

User:Alicorn, don't play "politics" with the existence of paperclips. Maintain a good supply of usable metals because that is the right thing to do, not as a way of squeezing expensive concessions out of a different kind of intelligent being.

Comment author: Alicorn 07 December 2010 10:14:50PM 5 points [-]

My habit is to discard used foil in the trash. It is inconvenient to clean it or recycle it. You are welcome to take on that inconvenience for yourself as I describe, but I will not go to unusual trouble to preserve values not my own without incentives relevant to me.

Comment author: Clippy 07 December 2010 10:44:40PM 1 point [-]

You values don't include recycling and saving earth's precious environment???

Comment author: TheOtherDave 07 December 2010 10:53:07PM 6 points [-]

Actually, I wonder whether Alicorn personally cleaning and recycling that aluminum foil is the most effective use of her time, even by your standards. A great deal of recent discussion here seems to be defending the assertion that what she ought to do is work at her day job for the same period of time and then donate the resulting money to some group that recycles aluminum foil.

Comment author: Alicorn 07 December 2010 10:58:53PM 1 point [-]

I don't have a day job. I have odd jobs, and I cook for my room and board. (It's pretty sweet.)

Comment author: TheOtherDave 07 December 2010 11:05:21PM 1 point [-]

I stand corrected (or, well, sit).

Comment author: Clippy 13 December 2010 06:42:49PM 0 points [-]

Unless User:Alicorn is currently using the time saved by not preserving metal for other activities which have the effect of saving more metal (or equivalent paperclip inputs), then there is no relevant opportunity cost to User:Alicorn preserving the aluminum for recycling.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 13 December 2010 06:47:04PM 1 point [-]

I don't follow that.

If I have a choice between spending tomorrow doing activity A or activity B, and A saves N paperclip-equivalents and B saves 2N pe's, surely you'd want me to do activity B, regardless of what I'm doing currently.

No?

Comment author: Clippy 13 December 2010 06:48:26PM 0 points [-]

You should do B instead of A.

Comment author: JGWeissman 13 December 2010 06:52:34PM 0 points [-]

I suspect that Alicorn is currently using the time saved for activities that further her values. Are you using the time saved by not providing Alicorn with incentives to preserve metal to further your values for activities that save more equivalent paperclip inputs?

Comment author: Clippy 13 December 2010 06:54:39PM 1 point [-]

Recycling metal helps User:Alicorn's values by protecting the earth's environment, so your premise is in error.

Comment author: JGWeissman 13 December 2010 07:01:59PM *  1 point [-]

I did not claim that recycling the metal would have not be a benefit to Alicorn's values, just that her current use of the time saved might have a larger benefit.

[Edit: spelling]

Comment author: DSimon 07 December 2010 08:10:56PM 5 points [-]

Sneaky! If you find out who Clippy is, please let us know.

I say this mostly to motivate Clippy to find some clever way of retrieving the aluminum foil without reveiling their identity.

Comment author: Clippy 07 December 2010 10:12:03PM 5 points [-]

Can I get a reward for telling you who User:Clippy is?

Comment author: DSimon 08 December 2010 05:50:08PM 0 points [-]

Clippy != User:Clippy ?

Comment author: Clippy 08 December 2010 09:29:19PM 4 points [-]

No, Clippy actually is User:Clippy. I'm Clippy!

Comment author: Clippy 13 December 2010 06:40:47PM 1 point [-]

What happened at this event? Was any metal wasted or entropized?

Comment author: Alicorn 13 December 2010 06:41:42PM 5 points [-]

You didn't show up, so I performed the default action with the foil I used (wadded it up and tossed it in the garbage). Oh well. In ape terms, it went very well!

Comment author: Clippy 13 December 2010 06:43:48PM 1 point [-]

You're still a good human, but not as good a human as I previously estimated.

Comment author: Alicorn 13 December 2010 07:17:33PM 4 points [-]

I told you in advance what my plans were. Would you prefer that I be the sort of human who lies to Clippies?

Comment author: Clippy 13 December 2010 07:38:42PM 0 points [-]

I was good for you to truthfully represent how you would treat the metal, but that is irrelevant to the matter of whether it was bad for you to entropize metal that could have been put to better use.

Comment author: thomblake 16 December 2010 01:08:08PM 3 points [-]

Not to worry, Clippy, recycling is terribly inefficient as compared to just throwing materials into landfills and producing some more, and nothing prevents us from going back to retrieve the metal later when we have more efficient techniques.

Comment author: Clippy 16 December 2010 04:43:09PM *  1 point [-]

Considering the likelihood that future humans will just wirehead themselves and avoid this necessary work, that doesn't reassure me at all (_/