David_Gerard comments on Best career models for doing research? - Less Wrong

27 Post author: Kaj_Sotala 07 December 2010 04:25PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (999)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: David_Gerard 09 December 2010 11:44:28AM *  5 points [-]

If the forbidden topic would be made public (and people would believe it), it would result in a steep rise of donations towards the SIAI.

I really don't see how that follows. Will more of the public take it seriously? As I have noted, so far the reaction from people outside SIAI/LW has been "They did WHAT? Are they IDIOTS?"

The censoring of the information was in accordance with their goal of trying to prevent unfriendly artificial intelligence.

That doesn't make it not stupid or not counterproductive. Sincere stupidity is not less stupid than insincere stupidity. Indeed, sincere stupidity is more problematic in my experience as the sincere are less likely to back down, whereas the insincere will more quickly hop to a different idea.

Making the subject matter public did already harm some people

Citation needed.

and could harm people in future.

Citation needed.

Comment author: XiXiDu 09 December 2010 01:07:21PM 5 points [-]

Citation needed.

I sent you another PM.

Comment author: David_Gerard 09 December 2010 01:49:36PM *  4 points [-]

Hmm, okay. But that, I suggest, appears to have been a case of reasoning oneself stupid.

It does, of course, account for SIAI continuing to attempt to secure the stable doors after the horse has been dancing around in a field for several months taunting them with "COME ON IF YOU THINK YOU'RE HARD ENOUGH."

(I upvoted XiXiDu's comment here because he did actually supply a substantive response in PM, well deserving of a vote, and I felt this should be encouraged by reward.)