Kingreaper comments on If reductionism is the hammer, what nails are out there? - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (46)
Even before 1-5 were succesfully reduced they were still seen as part of 7.
They were just seen as parts of 7 with different properties to the rest.
It doesn't really clarify my main point of confusion, which is what you're attempting to gain by listing 7 (ie. pretty much everything) as a single thing to be reduced