Perplexed comments on If reductionism is the hammer, what nails are out there? - Less Wrong

14 Post author: AnnaSalamon 11 December 2010 01:58PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (46)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Perplexed 11 December 2010 08:47:18PM 5 points [-]

one could design brains with different concerns, while still taking morality seriously.

It sounds a lot as if you are suggesting that there is some essence to morality which transcends "concerns are generated by our brains".

Comment author: Nick_Tarleton 19 December 2010 11:53:11AM 0 points [-]

"still taking morality seriously" modifies "one [who can...]", not "brains with different concerns".

Comment author: Perplexed 19 December 2010 03:20:34PM 0 points [-]

I'm not sure why you came to think there was some confusion on this point, so I will not presume to suggest where you went wrong in your reading.

Comment author: timtyler 12 December 2010 11:52:41AM *  0 points [-]

One attractor in the space of moral systems that doesn't have much to do with what could be engineered into brains is the class of moral systems that are favoured by natural selection.