One can receive partial-impact synopses of Saw without risking the full effect, and gauge their susceptibility with more information on hand.
True. I think that after reading the debate(s) about the censored post one should have a pretty good idea of what it is, though.
It might mollify people who disagree with the current implicit policy, and make discussion about the policy easier. Here's one option:
One requirement would be that the policy be no more and no less vague than needed for safety.
Discuss.