Alexandros comments on Folk grammar and morality - Less Wrong

20 Post author: Emile 17 December 2010 09:20PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (61)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Alexandros 17 December 2010 10:47:36PM 0 points [-]

I don't think the conclusion is "teach the correct rules of grammar at school". The people at Language Log are thoroughly descriptivist as I suspect is most of modern linguistics.

Comment author: Sniffnoy 17 December 2010 11:00:29PM 5 points [-]

That's not a contradiction. "Teach the correct rules of grammar at school" doesn't mean "teach people how to speak properly according to some prescriptive standard", it means "teach people (something approximating) the actual syntax of the English language so they can discuss it sensibly and understand something of what is actually happening when they put sentences together". (As opposed to the currently commonly taught "traditional grammar" which attempts to describe English but just gets it wrong.)

Comment author: Emile 17 December 2010 10:55:28PM 4 points [-]

I agree they're descriptivist; by "the correct rules" I meant "the rules that govern the way people actually speak" (in which case "teaching the rules" would be more "showing people what the rules are" and not "instructing people which rules they should follow", the same way a biology class on digestion doesn't tell people how to digest.)

But then I haven't done an in-depth research on the education policy advocated on Language Log.