wedrifid comments on Folk grammar and morality - Less Wrong

20 Post author: Emile 17 December 2010 09:20PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (61)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: prase 18 December 2010 11:36:26AM 3 points [-]

"what's the point? People figure out the rules independently of what factoids they're forced to memorize in school".

If there is a point in teaching biology, why not teach grammar, in a descriptive way? That language has some structure which can be analysed is something most people would not spontaneously realise, and even if they did, they would not have the common terminology. Without learning about grammar of my native language it would be far harder for me to understand the explanations of grammar of foreign languages.

Comment author: wedrifid 18 December 2010 11:54:25AM *  1 point [-]

The learning foreign languages point is a good one. Knowing the descriptive principles seems far more useful for that purpose than for anything to do with actual usage of the primary language itself. (Second most important use: knowing which words are acceptable when playing Scrabble!)