dspeyer comments on Rationalist Storybooks: A Challenge - Less Wrong

36 Post author: MBlume 18 March 2009 02:25AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (37)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Annoyance 18 March 2009 08:42:19PM *  13 points [-]

Keep in mind that Aesop's Fables didn't originally come with morals! That's a strictly Victorian perversion.

The Fables were originally meant to be understood and interpreted by everyone who heard them, themselves.

(edit) I will further note that many of the "traditional" morals pasted onto some of the Fables don't actually make much sense when looked at critically. Does "slow and steady wins the race" make sense in itself, much less as an explanation for "The Tortoise and the Hare"?

A much more plausible moral would be "talent is good, but hard work is better".

Comment author: dspeyer 19 February 2015 05:55:35AM 4 points [-]

Alternative moral: "No matter how great you are, there exists a level of pride sufficient to bring you down."