anonym comments on When It's Not Right to be Rational - Less Wrong

4 Post author: Annoyance 28 March 2009 04:15PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (21)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: anonym 29 March 2009 01:30:14AM 2 points [-]

That's a bad example.

In a singles bar, people don't respond to the beliefs of other people, but to their behavior. The success goes to those who behave appropriately, not to those who hold certain beliefs.

You might say that the best way to behave appropriately is to deceive yourself into thinking you're actually the hottest, but that is not what is going on in this case either. Offer the person a million dollars if they can correctly answer whether they were on average rated higher than anybody else or not by all members of the appropriate sex in the bar. Unless they actually are extremely attractive and probably the most attractive in the bar, their answer will be 'no'.

Comment author: SoullessAutomaton 29 March 2009 02:35:50AM 4 points [-]

You might say that the best way to behave appropriately is to deceive yourself into thinking you're actually the hottest

I think a more emotionally neutral term for this technique would be something like "Method Acting".

Comment author: anonym 29 March 2009 06:36:19AM 2 points [-]

"Method acting" is a very nice metaphor for what's actually going on: filling the mind with and identifying with a personality/character to the exclusion of normal thought processes, in order to more perfectly portray that other personality/character.

It's not self-deception though, no more than a child engrossed in pretending to be a dog is engaged in self-deception.