= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
venetian comments on Should criminals be denied cryonics? - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (49)
I don't disagree with you (except the part about Chimpanzees), but I can see this becoming a big issue eventually, like when some prisoner demanded a sex-change operation and the media freaked out, I can see them freaking out the same way when a major serial killer tries to sign up for cryonics: "Killer wants to be frozen to kill again in the fututre!"
I say keep the chimps, at least enough to support a viable population. None of this 'just in case' business. I want to conserve the heritage.
Would it be sufficient to just store some DNA samples, then?
It would be rather awesome if a major serial killer were to sign up for cryonics.
especially if sylvester stallone subsequently signed up, pledging to stop him in the future.
I tried to convince my friend Ted Kaczynski to sign up, but he didn't seem interested for some reason.