DanArmak comments on Two questions about CEV that worry me - Less Wrong

29 Post author: cousin_it 23 December 2010 03:58PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (137)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: DanArmak 23 December 2010 07:10:46PM *  4 points [-]

There have been other changes as well, which don't fit this generalization. For instance, we now treat the people who do have moral worth much better, in many ways.

Also, there have historically been major regressions along the "percentage of society having moral worth" scale. E.g., Roman Republican society gave women, and all Roman citizens, more rights than the post-Roman Christian world that followed.

Finally, "not random drift" isn't the same as "moving towards a global singular goal". A map with fractal attractors isn't random, either.

Comment author: WrongBot 23 December 2010 07:28:45PM 1 point [-]

Agreed on all points.