wedrifid comments on Narrow your answer space - Less Wrong

25 Post author: Vaniver 28 December 2010 11:38AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (111)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: wedrifid 04 January 2011 11:34:34PM 2 points [-]

Or you could operate using priors for individuals that match whatever little you happen to know about them. For instance their gender. For some purposes that is a lot of information.

Comment author: Perplexed 05 January 2011 12:01:13AM -1 points [-]

If you find it best to treat males one way (until they individually complain) and to treat females a different way (until they individually complain), then go ahead.

But (speaking to Phil, now) don't cry about the unfairness of the existence of people who don't fit your stereotypes. Don't bitch that you are receiving mixed messages, when you receive them from mixed people. And definitely do not appoint one woman as spokesperson for womankind by asking what she wants "as a woman".

There is no way to get through life without sometimes offending people. Live with it. But still, do the best you can. Rules change. Keep paying attention, and you will keep learning.

Comment author: wedrifid 05 January 2011 12:30:29AM *  1 point [-]

I made my reply because your quip made sense only as a response to a straw man. All the worse because it so smoothly presupposes a position that is trivially and obviously silly.

But (speaking to Phil, now) don't cry about the unfairness of the existence of people who don't fit your stereotypes. Don't bitch that you are receiving mixed messages, when you receive them from mixed people.

Your presentation here is a more significant misrepresentation of Phil and this time it is one that is overtly poor form. In particular it is condescending and riddled with negative labeling while at the same time demonstrating that you completely failed to comprehend his words.

For that matter the re-framing of my statement as treating (males or) females a different way until they individually complain wasn't much better. "Act like a Bayesian" isn't exactly an outlandish personal habit for someone to have and complaints (hopefully) don't come into it. If taking into account everything you do know while you are still making first impressions doesn't reduce complaints then you are quite possibly doing it wrong.