Jonathan_Graehl comments on Some rationality tweets - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (75)
I like that you're being terse. Many of these are puzzles - I need to discover a way to interpret them that allows me to like them.
Of these, I'm unsure:
Huh? It's clearly a belief (part of a map). That seems easily grasped once the question is posed. The early Enlightenment wasn't meta- enough for your liking, for not posing it?
You're implying that the insularity is a result of researchers gravitating toward areas where they're rewarded by other researchers more so than something that directly helps outsiders? I don't understand "scale faster".
In this metaphor, are learning and knowing investments that will return future cash? Why should there be different discount rates? Do you think the utility of learning something is more uncertain than the utility of knowing something? I don't understand how to act on this advice at all. Are you saying I should try hard not to forget what I already know, instead of learning new things?
What's meant is clear; the reason for it isn't.
Do you mean precommitment (burning the ships), or do you mean just to be aware of the cost of such a decision?
No. We can do neither. I can direct my attention slightly, and them maybe I'll forget.
Endorse? You mean, use it somehow?
By learning, I mean gaining knowledge. Humans can receive enjoyment both from having stuff and from gaining stuff, and knowledge is not an exception.
It's true that a dynamically-consistent agent can't have different discount rates for different terminal values, but bounded rationalists might talk about instrumental values using the same sort of math they use for terminal values. In that context it makes sense to use different discount rates for different sorts of good.
Writing the above comment got me thinking about agents having different discount rates for different sorts of goods. Could the appearance of hyperbolic discounting come from a mixture of different rates of exponential discounting?
I remembered that the same sort of question comes up in the study of radioisotope decay. A quick google search turned up this blog, which says that if you assume a maximum-entropy mixture of decay rates (constrained by a particular mean energy), you get hyperbolic decay of the mixture. This is exactly the answer I was looking for.