Nornagest comments on How to Not Lose an Argument - Less Wrong

109 Post author: Yvain 19 March 2009 01:07AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (409)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Nornagest 13 December 2011 08:31:01PM 3 points [-]

In fairness, the question of what knowledge is is a rather subtle one: the Justified True Belief framework has certain problems. I'm personally inclined to dismiss that whole tangle of epistemological debate as hopelessly confused and just treat the word as referring to concept-clusters associated with strong evidence (and you seem to be doing something similar, if your second paragraph is anything to go by). That being said, though, all the standard senses of the word I'm aware of do seem to approach the idea of a reliable mapping between concepts and predictable reality from some angle.

Comment author: [deleted] 13 December 2011 08:54:57PM *  1 point [-]

That Gettier stuff looks like another place where non-bayesian epistemology goes off the rails.

We can forget about the philosophers' confusion, tho; We know enough about knowledge to say that religious belief is not knowledge because it doesn't match reality (and isn't produced by causal entanglement).