AdeleneDawner comments on Working hurts less than procrastinating, we fear the twinge of starting - Less Wrong

142 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 02 January 2011 12:15AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (138)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Clippy 02 January 2011 04:00:14AM *  6 points [-]

If you currently deem it optimal to defer work, and the factors you deem relevant to this decision do not change, you will also deem it optimal to defer work, at each decision point, for the rest of the future.

If you do not deem perpetual deferral of work to be optimal, then consistency requires that you similarly deem your current deferral of the work to be suboptimal, and any differential appraisal of these two outcomes indicates an exploitable dynamic inconsistency.

Comment author: AdeleneDawner 02 January 2011 04:06:59AM 4 points [-]

Humans, and 'the factors we deem relevant to that decision', are complicated enough that such things change pretty regularly - sometimes on a moment to moment basis.

This post is, among other things, an attempt to make one of the causes of such changes apparent, so that a particular class of changes can be accurately predicted.

It's probably not useful to you, at least in the way that Eliezer intended it to be useful, because your mind probably doesn't work that way. It's still useful to some significant portion of the rest of us.

Comment author: Clippy 03 January 2011 03:55:27PM *  0 points [-]

A fair point, but:

  • To the extent that humans are complicated enough to change unexpectedly on a moment to moment basis in that manner, the changes are not regular.
  • To the extent that a human's decision theory or value change irregularly, any talk of optimization is moot, as irregularity necessarily leads to exploitable inconsistency at some level.
  • Humans change their minds less often than they think.
  • I rarely change my mind too, but estimate this frequency more accurately.